Gladiators, Gossip, and Gay Sex: The Secret Queer Culture of Ancient Rome

How status, power, and social norms shaped same-sex desire in Ancient Rome.

Jan 27, 2025

Let’s be honest: when we think of Ancient Rome, our brains usually go to gladiator fights, epic orgies, and men in togas sipping wine by candlelight. But what about its queer side? It turns out that same-sex action in Rome was as messy, fascinating, and sometimes scandalous as you’d hope. From horny emperors to hush-hush dinner parties, the Romans had a knack for blending sex, status, and desire in ways that can leave us both shocked and, at times, oddly affirmed. So, if you’re ready for a journey through a culture that didn’t really care about “gay” or “straight,” but did fuss over who was on top—quite literally—let’s dive in.

Why Ancient Rome Still Fascinates Us

We’ve all fantasized about the grandeur of the Roman Empire at least once—towering columns, sweaty gladiators, and swirling togas. But beyond the Hollywood glitz, there’s a deeper layer: queer desire thrived (and sometimes stumbled) in a society that refused to define sexuality through labels like “homosexual” or “heterosexual.” Instead, the big question was who played the “active” (penetrating) role and who played the “passive” (penetrated) role. This emphasis on roles rather than orientation gave Roman same-sex desire a unique flavor—both surprisingly open-minded and frustratingly repressive, depending on which rung of the social ladder you occupied.

For LGBTQ+ folks today, rediscovering the gay undercurrents of Ancient Rome is an act of empowerment—we have always been around, in every empire and on every marble step. Sure, the Romans were no angels, but by analyzing their world we see echoes of modern struggles and triumphs: sexual taboos, moral panics, love stories that defied norms, and sometimes downright exploitation that we can’t ignore.

Understanding Ancient Roman Sexuality: Status Before Orientation

Let’s set the record straight—pun intended. Romans didn’t think in terms of “gay vs. straight.” Instead, they focused on the distinction between being the penetrator or the penetrated. A high-status Roman male was expected to be the one doing the penetrating, whether his partner was male, female, or even enslaved. Admitting (or being rumored) to enjoy a “passive” role could dent your reputation, making you the subject of mocking poems and gossip-laden dinner parties.

The Greek Influence

Romans borrowed a lot from the Greeks—philosophy, art, architecture, and sexual norms. Greek pederasty, where an older man mentored and might also be romantically involved with a younger male, crept into Roman culture, but the Romans had less patience for any formalized relationship between older men and boys. It wasn’t exactly the same as Greek custom; the Romans introduced their own spin, layering it with class consciousness and civic identity. “Respectable” Roman men usually avoided looking “too Greek” in their relationships with younger partners, mindful that Romans prized dominance and avoided anything that reeked of softness or passive conduct.

Legal and Social Framework: Tolerance Meets Taboos

It’s a mistake to imagine Rome as a flamboyant paradise for “gay sex.” Sure, men hooking up with men wasn’t inherently forbidden, but it got complicated fast—especially if it involved freeborn youth.

Lex Scantinia

This was a statute that supposedly penalized sexual transgressions, including certain acts with freeborn minors. Though scholars debate its enforcement and scope, the fact that such a law existed hints that some parts of Roman society were uneasy about men having sex with adolescent boys. It wasn’t about “same-sex” as a concept, but about protecting freeborn youths from defilement. (Slaves, on the other hand, had zero protection.)

Shame vs. Crime

If you were a male Roman citizen who enjoyed being penetrated, you might not go to jail, but you’d be risking your public image—big time. Satirists and poets would tear you a new one (literally and figuratively). It was less “You’re breaking the law,” and more “Dude, you’re a disgrace.” A reputation for being the passive partner could stick with you forever, limiting your political ambitions and social clout.

Public Perception

The Romans loved their gossip. Comedies, satires, and day-to-day chatter thrived on speculations about who was doing what (and whom). The same society that could be pretty open about men hooking up also went ballistic if a high-status guy got pinned as a “bottom.” Respect, after all, hinged on your ability to show dominance, not yield it.

Everyday Encounters: Who, How, and Why?

So how did all this play out on a day-to-day level?

Masters and Slaves

The power imbalance here is massive and frankly uncomfortable to modern sensibilities. Enslaved people often had no say in sexual matters; if their master wanted sex, that was the end of the discussion. For wealthy Romans, having a male slave as a sexual partner wasn’t scandalous—at least not legally. Morally, it’s a minefield, and we have to recognize that from our modern vantage. Consent is complicated when one party literally owns the other.

Prostitution and Brothels

Male prostitution existed, sometimes discreetly, sometimes more openly. There were brothels specifically catering to men who desired other men, though the lines often blurred. Prostitutes were typically slaves or former slaves, and again, they lacked the rights to say no. As a freeborn Roman male, you could partake without too much blowback—provided you remained the penetrator and didn’t cause any high-profile scandal.

Dinner Parties and Revelries

Imagine a smoky banquet hall, wine flowing, guests reclined on couches—a near-perfect scenario for flirtation. At these gatherings, casual sexual connections could spark up. If a freeborn man singled out a pretty male slave or even a lower-status freeborn male, that might be overlooked so long as the social rules about roles were kept. Let’s just say, the lines between a “convivial evening” and an all-out orgy could blur if enough wine was poured.

Love or Lust? Examining Gay “Relationships” in Rome

It wasn’t all “slave-owners hooking up in a power imbalance.” Genuine affection and even long-term relationships did exist.

Friendship Turned Romantic

You might find stories of men who started as comrades in arms or political allies, only to develop deeper bonds. Roman literature, though it rarely labels these bonds as “gay,” sometimes hints at intense male friendships that, reading between the lines, could be romantic or sexual.

Poetry and Literature

Look at poets like Martial or Catullus: they wrote pieces that sometimes celebrated male beauty or hinted at longing for a male beloved. While Roman poetry often featured longing for women, there are enough verses with homoerotic undertones to suggest that men-lusting-after-men wasn’t exactly hush-hush—just couched in metaphor or coded language.

Secret Affairs vs. Public Knowledge

The biggest fear was losing respect if word got around that a man was playing a passive role or seducing someone’s freeborn son. But if you navigated the politics well—kept your paramour out of the public eye or stuck to non-citizens—you could enjoy a discreet love affair with minimal drama. Some men even flaunted their male lovers, especially if that lover was a foreigner or freedman whose status posed no threat to the Roman’s dignity.

Culturally Aware: Power Dynamics, Enslavement, and Consent

Before we glide on, let’s pause and address the elephant in the room: a big chunk of what we today call “gay sex” in Ancient Rome involved forced or coerced scenarios. That doesn’t mean Rome was a kinky utopia where everyone joyfully hopped in bed together. Slavery was widespread, and sexual violence or exploitation was commonplace. Enslaved men (and women) had virtually no legal standing to refuse an owner’s advances. We can’t celebrate Roman same-sex encounters without acknowledging this dark reality.

If we’re looking for the “romantic” side of Roman homosexuality, we might find traces in poetry, discreet partnerships, or philosophical circles (influenced by Greek ideas of mentoring and erotic admiration). But the broader context often hinged on power imbalances that would be appalling today. It’s a sobering reminder that while same-sex erotic expression always existed, it wasn’t always consensual or fair.

Notable Figures and Scandals

Julius Caesar

Stories circulated that he was the “wife” of King Nicomedes of Bithynia. Whether it’s true or slander, the rumor stuck, showcasing how Romans would smear a powerful man by claiming he was a passive partner in gay sex. Caesar dismissed such stories as trash talk, but they lingered, coloring his reputation with a hint of scandal.

Emperor Hadrian and Antinous

Now, this might be the closest we get to a high-profile gay love story in Rome. Though Hadrian was an emperor of the Greek-influenced side of the Empire, he openly adored his young companion Antinous. When Antinous drowned in the Nile, Hadrian was devastated, going as far as deifying him and founding a city in his memory. Many see this as a genuine love story transcending typical Roman cynicism.

The Gossip Culture

Roman society ran on rumors. Politicians routinely tried to degrade opponents by calling them passive homosexuals. Whether factual or not, it was a common smear tactic. This flood of innuendo, satire, and comedic plays made same-sex desire both visible and stigmatized in the public sphere.

Modern Reflections: Lessons from Ancient Rome

Labels vs. Roles

The Roman model—active vs. passive—illustrates that our modern “sexual orientation” labels aren’t universal. Romans might be confused by our attempts to categorize an entire person as “gay” or “bi” when they only cared about how sex was performed. That can be an eye-opener if you’re used to thinking strictly in terms of identity.

Power Dynamics Then and Now

We can’t look at Roman same-sex desire without confronting issues of exploitation and consent. Today’s LGBTQ+ discourse strongly emphasizes mutual respect. In Rome, the lines were blurred by class, slavery, and legal double standards. Reflecting on that helps us appreciate how far we’ve come—and how crucial it is to keep pushing for equitable sexual rights and freedoms.

Visibility and Erasure

Roman culture simultaneously acknowledged men having sex with men yet condemned or ridiculed it if the “wrong” social norms were broken. Sound familiar? Even now, queer folks navigate a world that can be welcoming one moment and hostile the next. Knowing the Romans wrestled with these contradictions reminds us that acceptance and stigma can coexist in messy ways.

Sexual Practices: Did Romans Go All the Way—or Just “Between the Thighs”?

One of the big questions people often ask is whether the Romans, like their Greek predecessors, mostly stuck to intercrural sex (rubbing between the thighs) or if they indulged in anal and oral play as well. The short answer? They absolutely did. While the Greeks sometimes encouraged intercrural encounters (especially in pederasty) to preserve a younger partner’s notional “bodily integrity,” the Romans took a more direct approach—anal, oral, or just about any act was fair game, as long as it didn’t compromise the social status of the dominant partner.

Anal Encounters

Power and Penetration: For Romans, who “stuck it where they liked” wasn’t inherently shameful—unless you were a freeborn male caught enjoying the passive role. In terms of the actual act, references in satires and graffiti show that anal sex was definitely on the menu.
Terminology: Latin words like futuere often signified penetrative sex (vulgar and straightforward), indicating that anal sex between men was no secret. As with everything, you wanted to be the penetrator, not the penetrated, if you prized your social standing.

Oral Pleasures

Irrumare vs. Fellare: Two handy (or mouthy) Latin terms. Irrumare often implied a man forcing someone’s mouth onto his penis—an act of dominance. Fellare, more akin to “fellatio,” could describe consensual oral but also had an undercurrent of humiliation if the partner was a freeborn citizen.
Tavern Graffiti & Poetry: Scandalous lines from poets like Martial or Catullus also reference oral acts in comedic or mocking ways—often with the aim of belittling a rival by suggesting he was a “cocksucker” (cunnilingus was ridiculed for men, too). Hence, real men “got sucked,” but never wanted to be the one doing the sucking—unless they kept it secret.

Did They Skip Intercrural?

Not entirely. Intercrural or “between the thighs” intercourse didn’t vanish when the Greeks handed the cultural baton to Rome. But in Roman writing, it’s mentioned less as a moral virtue and more as just another possible act. If a Roman man wanted to rub between someone’s thighs instead of penetrative sex (anal or oral), that was up to him. Anal and oral still reigned supreme when it came to scandalous jokes, erotic poetry, and the day-to-day reality of enslaved partners or prostitutes, who had little say in which acts they’d perform.

Bottom Line:
Romans loved variety, and while intercrural sex existed as one of many options, anal and oral sex featured far more prominently in their jokes, laws, and moral panic. As always, the social stigma fell on the person perceived as “submitting” (especially a freeborn male), not on the specific act itself. So yes, the Romans were definitely “going all the way”—and then some.

Bridging Past and Present

No matter how many centuries roll by, humans can’t help wanting a good romp in the sheets—and sometimes, that romp is with someone of the same sex. Ancient Rome illustrates a world that both celebrated and mocked queer desire, normalized certain forms of same-sex encounters while outlawing others, and left behind a legacy of raunchy poems, political slanders, and the occasional heartfelt romance.

For gay men today, it’s a mixed bag of inspiration and caution: on one hand, it’s liberating to see our erotic inclinations woven into such a legendary civilization. On the other, it’s sobering to note the exploitative and often brutal power structures that shaped “homosexual acts.” Yet, by revisiting these old scandals and laws, we remember that LGBTQ+ folks weren’t just invented in the modern era—we’ve been around forever, flipping the script, inciting rumors, and sometimes even deifying our beloveds.

So next time you picture a Roman feast—wine flowing, togas half-off, witty banter flying—imagine that corner of the courtyard where two men might be exchanging secret smiles, navigating the do’s and don’ts of a society that was both enthralled and horrified by their passion. History may not always be pretty, but damn if it’s not enthralling. And in that enthrallment, there’s plenty of room for modern queer hearts to recognize a piece of ourselves—power games and all.

Thanks for reading Gayety! This post is public so feel free to share it.